<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode #68 &#8211; This Podcast is Being Recorded&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediadriving.com/2009/06/09/episode-68-this-podcast-is-being-recorded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediadriving.com/2009/06/09/episode-68-this-podcast-is-being-recorded/</link>
	<description>A weekly podcast and blog about communications, content, messages and marketing. Toronto digital strategist and musician Jay Moonah is your host.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:10:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://mediadriving.com/2009/06/09/episode-68-this-podcast-is-being-recorded/comment-page-1/#comment-5288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediadriving.com/?p=308#comment-5288</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bob, yes I think this is part of what I was getting at, but it was also the numbness of _being_ recorded, as well as being exposed to recordings.  Its kind of sides of the same coin.  Remember when audio/video recording was rare enough that some people would hear a recording of their voice and say &quot;do I really sound like that?&quot;  I have a feeling, at least in our part of the world, that is phrase that&#039;s rarely spoken these days, and certainly not by younger people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bob, yes I think this is part of what I was getting at, but it was also the numbness of _being_ recorded, as well as being exposed to recordings.  Its kind of sides of the same coin.  Remember when audio/video recording was rare enough that some people would hear a recording of their voice and say &#8220;do I really sound like that?&#8221;  I have a feeling, at least in our part of the world, that is phrase that&#8217;s rarely spoken these days, and certainly not by younger people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob LeDrew</title>
		<link>http://mediadriving.com/2009/06/09/episode-68-this-podcast-is-being-recorded/comment-page-1/#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob LeDrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediadriving.com/?p=308#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>Jay, I think you&#039;re asking good questions, but I think the Raitt situation is not the best analogy. But I wanna get to the question that I think you&#039;re asking -- is the ubiquity of image making making us numb to it and its effects? 

And I think it is. I think we are getting numbed to the effects of still or moving images, except when they suddenly jump out of the sea of images we&#039;re confronted with. We can now be bombarded with images -- both ones we create and ones we consume at a rate nobody could have predicted. Flickr, facebook, youtube, twitpic, on and on. 

But I think they become visual static. I think we become inured to the endless flow unless they&#039;re showstoppers. That&#039;s why, I think, I like the Boston Globe&#039;s &quot;Big Picture&quot; feature. These large and mostly amazing images are able to stop me, to make me look intently. 

Most facebook shots? click click click, a thousand times an hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, I think you&#8217;re asking good questions, but I think the Raitt situation is not the best analogy. But I wanna get to the question that I think you&#8217;re asking &#8212; is the ubiquity of image making making us numb to it and its effects? </p>
<p>And I think it is. I think we are getting numbed to the effects of still or moving images, except when they suddenly jump out of the sea of images we&#8217;re confronted with. We can now be bombarded with images &#8212; both ones we create and ones we consume at a rate nobody could have predicted. Flickr, facebook, youtube, twitpic, on and on. </p>
<p>But I think they become visual static. I think we become inured to the endless flow unless they&#8217;re showstoppers. That&#8217;s why, I think, I like the Boston Globe&#8217;s &#8220;Big Picture&#8221; feature. These large and mostly amazing images are able to stop me, to make me look intently. </p>
<p>Most facebook shots? click click click, a thousand times an hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
