DOWNLOAD THE SHOW (playing time 10:13)

With so much data shared with third-party services, how much privacy do we really have nowadays? What are the limits to what YOU share online?
Mentioned in this episode:

• Jeremiah Owyang: “Who has more data about Gen Y: Facebook or the US Government?”
• Tommy Vallier
• Podcamp Toronto 2008 Media Archive with video from Tommy’s “Living On The Cloud” Presentation

 

 Episode #19 - Privacy: Do We Still Have Any?: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Popularity: 12% [?]

I rarely make predictions. That is ‘cus I am usually wrong. For example, in the early 80s when some of my friends were talking about the band U2 (whom you might have heard of since) I remember saying something to the effect of “yeah U2 are okay, but they’ll never be as popular as The Alarm.”

(Ahem.)

That being said, I’m going out a limb today. Something in a piece that I spotted via Cynthia Turner’s Cynopsis today might (MIGHT) be a game changer. Apparently Family Guy creator and general smart-ass Seth McFarlane is teaming up with a little company called Google to distribute his new show “Seth MacFarlane’s Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy” via the AdSense network.

In other words, rather than using TV or even a “traditional” Internet distribution strategy like setting up a website or a video podcast, these new animated shorts will be distributed to sites as part of their advertising inventory.

Now, I’m assuming there is some kind of sponsor attached to these shows who are footing the bill for distribution, but it’s definitely an interesting idea. This isn’t just video ads that are trying to be compelling as content, these ARE content, distributed via a network usually reversed for ads.

Think about it. I certainly will.

Popularity: 14% [?]

DOWNLOAD THE SHOW (playing time 14:13)

Sometimes media creators get paid for creating. Sometimes they don’t. When SHOULD you get paid?

Mentioned in this episode:

• Chris Brogan on why “Making Money Isn’t Evil”
• Podcasters Across Borders pab2008
  

 

 Episode #18 - Getting Paid (Or Not) for Media Creation: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Popularity: 25% [?]

On the most recent Media Bullseye podcast, Aaron Brazell (a.k.a. Technosailor) stated “If FriendFeed is going to have adoption (in the) mainstream, there’s going to have to be a name change. FriendFeed sounds tremendously creepy.”

This made me flashback about 10 years. I was reading Jakob Nielsen’s useit.com blog (in the days before we used the word “blog”) wherein he mentioned a new search engine. He described what had started as a university experiment and had evolved into a a new kind of search, where relivance was determined by the number and quality of sites linking into a particular site. This sounded like a great idea, but I didn’t think this search would ever take off because of it’s silly name.

In case you hadn’t guessed, the search site in question was Google.

Google is a silly name, but that name does appear to have been a barrier to its tremendous success. Ditto Yahoo. And Facebook. Facebook?!? There’s a dumb name if there ever was one.

If someone can give me an example of a truly great product or service that has been killed by it’s silly name, I’d love to hear it.

Popularity: 30% [?]

DOWNLOAD THE SHOW (playing time 2:55)

Do you find that limits and structure make you more creative, or are you most creative when you have all the time and opportunity in the world?

 

 Episode #17 - Creativity and Limits: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Popularity: 35% [?]

Things have been a bit nuts for me since the very successful Canadian Marketing Association Conference “From Mass to Grass” but I did want take a moment to share three of my favorite quotes of the day:

“Treat every (customer) who calls like they are Oprah.” - Julie Cole from Mabel’s Labels

“It takes three people commenting to change (the direction of) the conversation on a blog post.” - David Usher

“Consumers are talking more about marketing than they are about brands.” - Andrea Wojnicki, Rotman School of Management

I think there’s a tonne to consider in those three statements, let alone the rest of the amazing discussion that happened on Thursday. Thanks to all the presenters, the CMA staffers, and my fellow WOM committee members for helping to make it a fantastic and thought-provoking day!

Popularity: 38% [?]

DOWNLOAD THE SHOW (playing time 10:11)

Will old media be killed off by new media? History would seem to indicate otherwise, but what do you think?
Mentioned in this episode:

• Steve Ballmer in the Washington Post, Thursday June 5, 2008
• For Immediate Release #351

 

 Episode #16 - Old Media, New Media: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Popularity: 45% [?]

From Billboard.com today:

AC/DC’s next studio album will be exclusively sold at Wal-Mart stores in the United States, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. The as-yet-untitled Columbia album, which, as previously reported, was produced by Brendan O’Brien, is expected in the fall.

First The Eagles, now this? It was weird enough when the band who did “The Last Resort” offered their latest release through Wal-Mart, but now AC/DC! It may be good business, but does this seem utterly incongruous to anyone else?

Do you think these classic rock groups doing more damage to their brand and their legacy with these kinds of deals, or do you think it’s just a way to sell more records so good on ‘em?

Popularity: 42% [?]

…There will be no media consumption left in 10 years that is not delivered over an IP network. There will be no newspapers, no magazines that are delivered in paper form. Everything gets delivered in an electronic form.

Steve Ballmer in the Washington Post, Thursday June 5, 2008

It never ceases to amaze me how many otherwise smart people simply don’t understand the history of media. New media NEVER kill off old media, they just change the role of the media that came before.

People still go see and hear live music despite the existence of records and CDs. People still go to the theatre despite the existence of movies. People still go to movies despite the existence of TV and DVD players. People will still read newspapers and magazines despite the existence of computers and the Internet… for a very, VERY long time to come.

Thinking about how digital will change the role of traditional offline media is a worthy and interesting pursuit. Proclaiming them dead is just intellectual laziness.

Popularity: 48% [?]

Listening today to last week’s Media Bulleye roundtable podcast (in particular their discussion of “social media burnout”) got me to thinking about the status of various technologies relative to our dear old friend the “fishbowl” a.k.a. the echo chamber a.k.a. are we all just a bunch of nerds talking to ourselves?

This list is by no means exhaustive, (not even close!) nor are the statuses I assign going to necessarily be correct next week (or by the time I hit the publish button for that matter) but here’s my current take on some of the most familiar names in Web 2.0-osity as relates to how they are seen by those inside and outside the mythic Bowl…

Facebook
Fishbowl Status: OUT

Facebook is arguably the poster child for a social media technology that has broken through to the mainstream. That’s been good and bad for it. Most of my friends from high school seem to be on Facebook, but many of them wouldn’t know a blog if it hit them in the head. In the meantime bloggers like Neville Hobson have turned up their noses at Facebook — personally I’m still not sure if I consider this elitist or an excellent mental health preservation tactic, but I do find it funny how success with the masses often breeds contempt with the pioneers and early adopters.

Twitter
Fishbowl Status: ON IT’S WAY OUT (?)

It seems like Twitter has been getting a lot of press and attention lately. The Toronto Star published yet another Twitter article this past weekend, which is usually a sign in this country at least that something has broken through to the general consciousness. Personally I’m still not sure if Twitter really has a place in the lives of most people — for the connectors and mavens of the world it plays a clear role, but will the vast majority of people find real value in a stream of Tweets? (And that’s assuming the service is up when they check, a dubious prospect these days at best!)

Myspace
Fishbowl Status: WAY, WAY OUT

Myspace is all but forgotten among the social media elite, but it’s important to remember that it still has larger overall traffic than Facebook or Twitter. As Christopher Penn pointed out in a blog post last year “Myspace is over its Dip.” It may not be relivant to those interested in the cutting edge, but for marketers, musicians and others, there’s still juice to be had in Myspace-land.

Second Life
Fishbowl Status: WAS OUT, NOW BACK IN

A little while back I blogged about how Second Life was and is a concept just a little bit ahead of its time. Since then, there seems to be some renewed interest in last year’s media darling. Part of the reason seems to be the installation of Mark Kingdon as the new CEO for Second Life parent company Linden Lab. That Kingdon comes from an agency background is particularly interesting — it’s useful to remember that Linden never really marketed Second Life, nor did they directly engage with most of the companies who created presences there. Putting Kingdon at the top seems to indicate that they are actually ready to partner and promote what remains a virtual world with amazing potential.

Blogs
Fishbowl Status: READING, OUT. WRITING, IN.

I think there’s a common perception inside the social media fishbowl that everyone has their own blog. It’s not true. It’s really, REALLY not true. For example, I work at a digital marketing agency. Everyone who works there, by definition, has a higher-than-average expertise and understanding of online technology. They are, again by definition, all involved at some level in marketing, design and programming, which are three of the most common blogging topic areas. They are also all pretty darn smart. I would estimate 5-10% have a blog. 15%, absolute tops. Pretty low, all things considered. That said, many of them read blogs of one kind or another. But it’s that old 1% rule at play… a small minority create, the rest consume.

Podcasts
Fishbowl Status: STILL IN. (SIGH…)

I hate to say it, but podcasting may be doomed to be the ham radio of the new millennium. The only podcasts that seem to have much notice by the public at large are those created by traditional media outlets or celebrities. The fact that the CBC or Ricky Gervais can have popular podcasts is great I suppose, but it’s not exactly been the breakthrough medium many of us had hoped.

YouTube
Fishbowl Status: LIKE, TOTALLY OUT

While podcasting seems to have faltered, media producers trying to reach a mass audience do have YouTube as a place to publish. You’ll be up against everything from John Stewart to cats on tricycles, but at least you won’t have to explain to anyone how it works.

FriendFeed
Fishbowl Status: SEEMS TO EXIST TO BE IN

FriendFeed’s primary use is to take all the feeds from all the other networks you use and put them into FriendFeed. Until all its content sources are out of the fishbowl, can FriendFeed itself every truly be out?

Popularity: 63% [?]